We show that GWG exhibits strong convergence guarantees.

Effective resistances have a broad range of algorithmic implications.

Our estimators assume that there is no interference between the units, i.e., that the treatment of one The first assumption is quite realistic as in most peer review systems the reviewers cannot see other reviews until they submit their own. The second assumption is important to understand, as there could be "batch effects": a Monte Carlo methods to tightly estimate these covariances. AAAI datasets, we sampled 1 million assignments and computed the empirical covariance. In our setting, small amounts of attrition (relative to the number of policy-induced positivity violations) mean that the fraction of data that is missing is not exactly known before assignment, but almost. To get more robust estimates of the performance, we repeat this process 10 times.

In our case, it boils down to: ' The smoothing effect induced by the average helps to reduce the visual noise, and hence improves the explanations. For the experiment, m and are the same as SmoothGrad. We start by deriving the closed form of Saliency (SA) and naturally Gradient-Input (GI): ' The case of V arGrad is specific, as the gradient of a linear system being constant, its variance is null. W We recall that for Gradient Input, Integrated Gradients, Occlusion, ' It was quickly realized that they unified properties of various domains such as graph theory, linear algebra or geometry. Later, in the '60s, a connection was made At each step, the insertion metric selects the concepts of maximum score given a cardinality constraint.